The pages so far in this section have been a summary
of the role and status of CDA as a 'school', but the following points
can be made which question how the 'school' functions :-
- with a variety of theoretical background(s), CDA works eclectically,
touching on the whole range from grand theories to linguistic
techniques - each individual approach emphasises different levels
- there is no accepted canon for data collection
- operationalising and analysis is problem oriented and implies
linguistic expertise
- many practitioners have a shared interest in social processes
of power, hierarchy building, exclusion and subordination
- CDA in the majority of cases takes the part of the underprivileged
- CDA tries to show the linguistic means used by the privileged
to stabilise or even intensify iniquities in society
Therefore Widdowson says "CDA constantly sits on the fence
between social research and political argumentation" (from
Jaeger, 2001, p. 34 references)
|
|