| Each of the main theorists of CDA have their own areas
of interest and they use their own key concepts.
Wodak reports that for Halliday and Kress, three concepts figure
indispensably in all CDA, the concept of power, the concept
of history, and the concept of ideology (Wodak, 2001,
p. 3 references),
However, Halliday (one of the fathers of CDA) concentrated on language
itself, and discovered three meta-functions of language which are
continuously interconnected:-
- firstly, the ideational function through which language lends
structure to experience (the ideational structure has a dialectical
relationship with social structure, both reflecting and influencing
it)
- secondly, the interpersonal function which constitutes relationships
between the participants;
- and thirdly, the textual function which constitutes coherence
and cohesion in texts (in Wodak, 2001, p. 8 references)
For Meyer, the most important characteristics of CDA are:-
|
|
- All discourses are historical, and can therefore only
be understood in relation to their context
- So, CDA refers to such extralinguistic factors as culture, society
and ideology
- In any case, the notion of context is crucial for CDA,
since this explicitly includes social-psychological, political,
and ideological components
- CDA therefore postulates an interdisciplinary procedure (Meyer,
2001, p. 15 references)
Van Dijk's way of doing CDA is a socio-cognitive approach, with
a current particular interest in cognition. In particular, he describes
the "Discourse - Cognition - Society Triangle":-
- Discourse is meant as a communication event, including
conversational interaction, written text, as well as associated
gestures, facework, typographical layout, images, and any other
semiotic or multimedia dimension of signification
- Cognition here means both personal as well as social
cognition, beliefs, and goals as well as evaluations and emotions,
and any other mental or memory structures, representations or
processes involved in discourse or interaction
- Society is meant to include both the local, microstructures
of situated face-to-face interactions, as well as the more global,
societal and political structures variously defined in terms of
groups, group-relations (such as dominance and inequality), movements,
institutions, organisations, social processes, political systems
and more abstract properties of societies and cultures (van Dijk,
2001, pps. 97-98 references)
He also describes Context Models,
Event Models, and the Dispositive,
which I examine elsewhere.
Fairclough is especially interested in semiosis and social practices
- Semiosis is an irreducible part of the material social
processes, and it ncludes all forms of meaning-making - visual
images and body language, as well as language
- Social life can be seen as interconnected networks of Social
Practices of diverse sorts - economic, political, cultural,
etc.
- Every practice has a semiotic element
- Focussing on social practices allows one to combine the perspective
of structure and the perspective of action
One
the one hand, a practice is a relatively permanent way of acting
socially (defined by its position within a structured network
of practices)
A
practice is a domain of social action and interaction which both
reproduces structures and has the potential to transform them
All
practices are practices of production - they are the arenas where
social life is produced, whether economic, political, cultural
or everyday life.
Discourses are diverse representations of social life which are
inherently positioned - different social actors see and represent
social life in different ways, with different discourses. The lives
of the poor are represented through different discourses in the
social practices of government - politics, medicine, etc, and differently
within each of these areas depending on the social actor's own position
(Fairclough, 2001, p. 122-3 references)
He continues that "Social practices networked together constitute
a social order (e.g. the current neo-liberal global order
of the new capitalism, or, at a more local level, the social order
of education at a particular time). The semiotic order of a social
order is what we call an order of discourse, and it is the way in
which genres and discourses are networked together. One aspect of
this ordering is dominance: some ways of making meaning are
dominant (or mainstream), others are marginal, or oppositional,
or alternative
.(e.g. doctor - patient consultations)
The political concept of hegemony can be used to describe
some of these orders of discourse - even legitimised common sense
can lead to relations of dominance
An order of
discourse is an open system (not necessarily closed or rigid) which
is put at risk by what actually happens in interactions."
"CDA
oscillates between a focus on structure
and a focus on action -
Between
a focus on shifts in social structuring of semiotic diversity (orders
of discourse)
And a
focus on the productive semiotic work which goes on in particular
texts and events
In both perspectives, a central concern is shifting articulations
between genres, discourses and styles - the shifting social
.
relations between them which achieve a relative stability and permanence
in orders of discourse, and the ongoing relations between them in
texts and interactions" (Fairclough, 2001, p. 124 references)
Scollon writes
that there IS a problem of relating discourse
to social action - a lot of the time, one has to make an effort
to interpret actions in terms of discourse, especially with habitual
and group behaviours. He also introduces MDA (mediated discourse
analysis) which shares all the goals of CDA, but changes from a
focus on the discourse about social issues to a focus on the social
actions through which social actors produce the histories and habitus
of their daily lives, which is the ground in which society is produced
and reproduced (Scollon, 2001, p. 145 references).
For example, in my food project, it could be more valuable to watch
people shopping than to analyse discourses.
This gives an idea of the wide range of approaches which are possible
in CDA, and each of these approaches generates its own set of methods
and tools, which I will summarise in some of the following pages.
|